Search for: All records

Monitoring the impacts of global efforts to reduce mercury (Hg) emissions is limited by the collection of biological samples at appropriate spatiotemporal scales. This is especially true in the deep sea, a vast region with food webs that cycle bioaccumulative methylmercury (MeHg). Within a species, understanding the distribution of Hg across tissue types can reveal how Hg accumulates in the body and inform how useful a species is for biomonitoring geographic regions or vertical habitats of the ocean. We focus on a globally distributed deep-sea fish, the longnose lancetfish (Alepisaurus ferox, n = 69 individuals), and measure total mercury (THg) and MeHg concentrations in 10 tissue types (brain, caudal white muscle, dorsal white muscle, gallbladder, gill filament, gonad, heart, intestine, liver, and stomach lining). Across all tissue types, THg and MeHg concentrations were higher in large lancetfish (≥1.8 kg) than small lancetfish (<1.8 kg), but concentrations were relatively stable within size classes. THg levels were highest in liver, intestine, and heart, followed by caudal white muscle, dorsal white muscle, stomach lining, and gill filament, then by gonad and gallbladder. We describe how ontogenetic diet shifts explain Hg bioaccumulation in pelagic predators inhabiting similar waters to lancetfish. We hypothesize that diet shifts to deeper-dwelling prey and fishes drive increases in THg and MeHg concentrations in large lancetfish. We propose lancetfish as a strong candidate for monitoring spatiotemporal variability of Hg in the deep pelagic – they are commonly captured in global fisheries and may reflect Hg sources in two distinct vertical habitats of the ocean. 

Abstract We quantified cephalopods consumed by longnose lancetfish (Alepisaurus ferox,n = 1267 stomachs containing cephalopod remains) from 2009 to 2018 in the central North Pacific Ocean (between 0–35° N and 135–175° W). When cephalopods identified from beak remains in the stomach contents were included in diet analyses, clear increases in the abundance of gelatinous taxa and the inferred foraging depths of lancetfish were evident. Ontogeny in cephalopod consumption was evident for lancetfish, corroborating past diet studies. Small lancetfish (fork length < 97 cm) fed on smaller, muscular cephalopods from shallow habitats (0–500 m, e.g., Ommastrephidae, Onychoteuthidae), while large lancetfish (fork length ≥ 97 cm) consumed larger, gelatinous cephalopods from deeper waters (depths greater than 500 m, e.g., Amphitretidae, Cranchiidae). Cephalopod beaks were more abundant in the diets of large lancetfish, representing 37.8% of identified cephalopods, numerically. Although beaks likely remain in stomachs longer than soft tissues, they did not simply accumulate with increasing predator size. Cephalopods identified from beaks were also significantly larger than those identified from soft tissues. Despite having low average energy densities, large gelatinous cephalopods are important prey for lancetfish in deep habitats, with energetic values that are comparable to smaller, more muscular cephalopods (95.3 ± 125.8 kJ and 120.2 ± 169.4 kJ, respectively). Holistic consideration of cephalopod beaks in diet analyses will help to elucidate predator foraging behaviors and the trophic and ecological roles of gelatinous cephalopods in deep pelagic food webs.